Reusable Grocery Bags: Good or Bad for the Environment?

Are reusable grocery bags good or bad for the environment?

For every news article that tells us ‘Reusable bags are better for the environment’ there seems to be another one saying ‘Reusable bags are not really eco-friendly’.

The arguments for and against the environmental sustainability of reusable shopping bags can be confusing, so what’s the truth?

WHY DO WE NEED REUSABLE BAGS?

Our ever-increasing use of disposable plastic bags is causing problems around the world, including environmental damage, climate change and pollutiondamage to wildlife and natural habitats, and harm to human health.

Reusable bags can help solve these problems by reducing the number of single-use plastic bags manufactured and discarded every day.

WHAT IMPACT DO REUSABLE GROCERY BAGS HAVE ON THE ENVIRONMENT?

There is a wide range of reusable bags available today; some are better for the environment than others due to the materials used, manufacturing processes and end-of-life disposal.

All bags – including those sold as ‘eco-friendly’ – have some environmental impact. Reusable bags are generally stronger and heavier. It takes more resources to make them, resulting in a larger environmental footprint.

However, they can be used hundreds of times which makes them more environmentally friendly in the long run.

The impact of a reusable grocery bag on the environment depends on:

  1. How it’s made
  2. How it’s used

Here’s what you need to know about how bags are made: 

Natural fabric bags

Some natural-fibre bags such as cotton and canvas have a significant impact on the environment due to the way the crops are grown and processed.

While cotton is a renewable material, its production requires large quantities of water, pesticides, energy and fertilizers.

If you are interested in buying a cotton tote and want to keep your environmental impact as low as possible… Choose organic and recycled cotton, or calico, an unbleached cotton material that undergoes less processing.

Hemp and jute (also called hessian or burlap) need less pesticide and fertilizer than cotton, but still use a significant amount of water in cultivation.

Plastic reusable bags

Many different types of plastic can be used to make reusable bags. As plastic is a non-renewable source and the manufacturing process contributes to climate change, they have a large environmental footprint.

Reusable bags made from recycled PET (polyethylene terephthalate) are a more eco-friendly choice.  Made from recycled plastic bottles, PET fabric has an almost 90% lower carbon footprint than nylon, and 75% lower than polyester.

To give them added strength and durability, however, reusable bags are often manufactured using more than one material. This can make them harder to recycle, which increases their environmental impact as they must be incinerated or sent to landfill.

Key Takeaway: Reusable grocery bags made from recycled materials are significantly more environmentally friendly than similar bags made from virgin plastic materials.

Considering all the negatives, how can a reusable bag be more eco-friendly than a disposable plastic bag?

It’s all about how often you use it.

Here’s what you need to know about how bags are used:

When are reusable bags more eco-friendly than single use plastic bags?

The more you use them the more eco-friendly they become…

UK study concluded that whatever type of bag is used, the key to reducing the impact is to reuse it as many times as possible.

Studies have shown that conventional disposable bags have a lower environmental impact than reusable bags if you compare them for a single use.

As you use a reusable bag over and over, it becomes more environmentally friendly than disposable bags.

The minimum number of times each bag must be reused in order to be more environmentally friendly than a single use disposable bag varies:

  • Cotton tote bag – 173 times
  • Typical fold up reusable bag – non-woven polypropylene (PP) – 14 times
  • Paper bag – 4 times
  • Recycled plastic bag – 2 times or less

Get the full breakdown hereDisposable vs Reusable: Environmental Impact Evaluation

Reusing the bags at least this number of times ensures that they have a lower global warming potential and are more eco-friendly than conventional disposable HDPE bags you get at checkout.

Do reusable bags really reduce my environmental footprint?

Yes, absolutely – but only if you use them again and again.

In terms of sustainability, reusable bags are just like many other products that we buy. Whether we buy clothes or shoes, furniture or food, it’s more eco-friendly if we use it to its fullest potential.

Throwing away unused or under-utilized items is a waste of resources, so don’t just buy a reusable bag – use it, reuse it… then use it some more. 

Learn more about the plastic problem and how we can solve it:

The Problem with Plastic

Solving The Plastic Problem

Find A Solution

Second Life Tote: More sustainable on 1st use. Made from recycled plastic, this tote has the lowest breakeven point of any bag on the market. Check it out >>

The Daily – Pack Down: Goes with you anywhere – designed to be used daily – hundreds of times. Never forget your reusable again. Check it out >>

Produce Reusables: Don’t forget about your veggies. Plastic produce bags are so unnecessary. Replace them with a simple and reusable alternative. Check it out >>

Pros and Cons of Reusable Grocery Bags

What are the pros and cons of reusable grocery bags?

Plastic is threatening many aspects of life these days. With 4.8 to 12.7 million tons of plastic ending up in the world’s oceans each year, and 80% of that coming from the land and coastlines, there’s overwhelming concern about the plastics we use in our every day lives.

So what can you do personally to reduce your plastic use? One of the simplest ways to do so is to invest in reusable grocery bags.

There are many advantages to using reusable grocery bags, and they’re also much more environmentally friendly. Below is a list of comparable advantages to reusable grocery bags. While we definitely recommend investing in one, it’s important to weigh the pros and cons before making this lifestyle choice.                                                                                                                                  

Advantages of Reusable Bags

Reusable

One of the biggest advantages to using reusable grocery bags is that they’re reusable! You can take them with you every time you go shopping. This means that you are one less person contributing to the 500 billion to 1 trillion plastic bags being used each year. And because you’ll be toting around your newest reusable bag, rather than all of the plastic bags you receive at the store, you’ll clear up space in your home or car where plastic bags used to reside, and reduce your waste overall.

Environmental Impact

Which brings us to the next advantage: environmental impact. Reusable bags are much better for the environment than single use plastic bags. Plastic grocery bags contribute to the death of one million birds, 100,000 turtles, and other sea animals that ingest plastic each year. And while the environmental cost of production for some reusable materials may be higher than single use HDPE plastics, that difference is counteracted by the amount of uses a reusable bag can have. In only 14 uses a durable polypropylene plastic bag becomes more environmentally friendly than an HDPE bag.  

Money Saving

Reusable grocery bags also have the potential to save you money. Many grocery stores and even many cities and states are starting to charge for plastic bags. Rather than spending an extra couple bucks at the grocery store on disposable bags, reusable bags allow you to save money on each trip. You’re also reducing the amount of money your city spends on waste disposal. Each year, California alone spends $300 million cleaning up coastal litter.

Multipurpose

That compactable bag you bring with you to the grocery store can also carry your work supplies, your laundry, your beach gear, or even the contents of your purse. Reusable bags, unlike plastic grocery bags, are stronger, more durable, and can hold more things. There’s an infinite amount of purposes for your reusable shopping bag aside from the weekly trip to the grocery store. Use it for trips, for storage, or to support your favorite event or brand.

Personal and Creative

Speaking of supporting your favorite brand, reusable bags are also a convenient and useful way to express your creativity. Whether you design your own canvas bag, carry your favorite logo, or merely buy the most visually appealing bag to match your style, reusable bags are a very useful tool. You can even make your own reusable plastic bags, which are not only creative and personal, but also utilize old, used grocery bags in your home.

Disadvantages of Reusable Bags

Bacteria

Many people fail to think about what exactly they’re putting in their bags. We already stated that reusable bags are multipurpose, however many individuals don’t think about the buildup of bacteria from the multitude of things that get put in there. Research has proven that reusable bags eventually build up bacteria, such as coliform bacteria and even E. coli, without proper washing. However, their study also found that a simple hand or machine wash in between uses cleared up any residual bacteria.

Extra Baggage

Yes, single use grocery bags are just plain convenient. There’s no getting around the fact that remembering to bring your own bag to the grocery store is more tedious than just grabbing one while you’re there. However, the more you do, the more of a habit you create, and the easier it becomes. I don’t even think about the compact purple bag that’s stuffed in my purse anymore. The more you use it, the more convenient it becomes, and the less convenient it is to house tens of used plastic bags in your home.

Difficult to Dispose Of

Currently, many reusable bags are made of materials that are hard to dispose of, such as polyester, nylon, or polypropylene. While some recycling facilities do exist for these materials, they are few and far between. Fortunately, most reusable bags are made to last, so you won’t have to worry about disposing of them for some years. And hopefully while you’re getting your uses in, more and more recycling opportunities sprout up for these types of materials. 

While yes, there are certain disadvantages to reusable bags, it seems there are far more advantages. Plastic pollution is quickly becoming one of the most pressing global, environmental, and structural problems to date. If we don’t act now, plastic will continue to infiltrate our oceans, waterways, soil, and food. Reusable bags may be lacking in convenience of single use plastic bags, but they are certainly one of the more simple problems we can stand to reduce merely through more conscious shopping.

Find A Solution

Second Life Tote: More sustainable on 1st use. Made from recycled plastic, this tote has the lowest breakeven point of any bag on the market. Check it out >>

The Daily – Pack Down: Goes with you anywhere – designed to be used daily – hundreds of times. Never forget your reusable again. Check it out >>

Produce Reusables: Don’t forget about your veggies. Plastic produce bags are so unnecessary. Replace them with a simple and reusable alternative. Check it out >>

Never miss another headline about the plastic pollution crisis

Insightful news about the world’s growing plastic pollution problem,
delivered to your inbox – free – every Monday.

“This is where I get my news.” – Ken Cook, founder, Environmental Working Group


#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

#mc_embed_signup .mc-field-group input[type=”text”], #mc_embed_signup .mc-field-group input[type=”email”] {
font-size: 18px;
padding: 5px 0;
}
#sNewsletter_Signup_0_14_0_0_0_2_0_0{
width: 100%;
max-width: 700px;
margin: 0 auto 50px auto;
float: none;
}
#sNewsletter_Signup_0_14_0_0_0_2_0_0 h2{
font-size: 45px;
text-align: center;
margin-bottom: 20px;
margin-top: 50px;
}
#sNewsletter_Signup_0_14_0_0_0_2_0_0 .nw-description{
font-weight: 400;
font-size: 17px;
font-family: Lato;
line-height: 1.5;
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
#mc_embed_signup_scroll .mc-field-group{
display: table !important;
height: 35px;
float: none;
width: 100% !important;
margin-bottom: 10px !important;
clear: both !important;
}
#mc_embed_signup_scroll .mc-field-group h4{
letter-spacing: -.6px;
font-family: Lato;
line-height: normal;
font-size: 20px;
margin-top: 0;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}

#mc_embed_signup_scroll .mc-field-group ul li{

}
.mc-field-group ul li.clear{
width: 100%;
clear: both;
height: 1px;
}
#mc_embed_signup_scroll .mc-field-group{
padding-bottom: 15px;
font-weight: 400;
font-size: 17px;
font-family: Lato;
line-height: 1.5;
}

.mc-field-group.input-group{
min-height: auto !important;
margin: 0 !important;
padding: 0 !important;
}
.mc-field-group.input-group ul{
margin-top: 0 !important;
padding-top: 0 !important;
}
#mc_embed_signup form {
display: block;
position: relative;
text-align: left;
padding: 0px;
}
#mc_embed_signup .clear{
text-align: center;
}
#mc_embed_signup .button{
//margin: 25px auto 50px auto !important;
float: none !important;
clear: none;
font-size: 20px;
background: #3393CF;
padding: 10px 25px;
height: auto;
line-height: auto;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.mc-field-group ul{
margin-bottom: 10px !important;
display: table !important;
width: 100%;
}
.mc-field-group ul li{
width: 48%;
display: inline-table;
float: left;
padding-bottom: 15px !important;

}
.mc-field-group ul li label b{
font-size: 18px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
display: block;
}
.mc-field-group ul li label:first-of-type{
float: left;
margin-right: 10px;
}
.mc-field-group ul li label:last-of-type{
width: calc(100% – 50px) !important;
display: table !important;
margin-left: 10px;
padding-top: 3px;
}
#mc_embed_signup_scroll .mc-field-group:nth-of-type(4) ul li:first-child{
#display: none !important;
}
#mc_embed_signup_scroll .mc-field-group:nth-of-type(4) ul li:nth-child(2){

}
#mc_embed_signup form input{
font-family: Lato, sans-serif;
}
#mc_embed_signup div#mce-responses{
padding: 0px;
color: #fff !important;
overflow: visible;
margin: 0 !important;
}
#mc_embed_signup div#mce-responses .response{
width: 100%;
text-align: left;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
color: #fff;
border-radius: 5px;
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
}
#mce-success-response{
padding: 10px !important;
display: block;
background: green;

}
#mce-error-response{
padding: 10px !important;
display: block;
background: red;
}
h4.hdesc {
letter-spacing: -.6px;
font-family: Lato;
line-height: normal;
font-size: 20px;
margin-top: 0;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
ul.ul-full-width li{
width: 100% !important;
clear: both;
float: none !important;
padding-bottom: 0 !important;
}
#mc_embed_signup .mc-field-group input.email{
width: calc(100% – 110px) !important;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
float: left;
border-radius: 4px 0px 0px 4px;
-moz-border-radius: 4px 0px 0px 4px;
-webkit-border-radius: 4px 0px 0px 4px;
}
#mc_embed_signup .button.submit {
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
float: none;
clear: none;
font-size: 18px;
padding: 2px 10px;
height: auto;
line-height: auto;
text-transform: uppercase;
width: 100px;
border-radius: 0px 4px 4px 0px;
-moz-border-radius: 0px 4px 4px 0px;
-webkit-border-radius: 0px 4px 4px 0px;
}
.top-section{
background: transparent url(https://feeds.ehn.org/images/bg-plasticine.jpg) no-repeat center top !important;
background-size: 100% 100% !important;
/*overflow: hidden;*/
display: table;
position: relative;
margin-top: -25px;
margin-bottom: -20px;
padding: 20px;
}
/*.top-section:before{
content: “”;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
background: rgba(255,255,255,0.8);
top: 0;

}*/
.top-section .row-wrapper{
position: relative;
}
#sSubscribe_to_Into_the_Plasticene_0_0_2_1_0_0{
margin-top: 20px;
}
#sSubscribe_to_Into_the_Plasticene_0_0_2_2{
padding: 50px;
}
#sSubscribe_to_Into_the_Plasticene_0_2_0_1{
background: rgba(255,255,255,0.8);
padding: 20px;
}
#sSubscribe_to_Into_the_Plasticene_0_2_0_2{
background: rgba(255,255,255,0.8);
padding: 20px;
}
#mc_embed_signup {
background: transparent !important;

No Place is Safe from Plastic

It seems we are hearing about plastic a lot these days. The environmental impact of disposable bags, the nearly 20 billion pounds of plastic entering our oceans each year, the rising amount of sea life whose lives are endangered from plastic – The list goes on and on.

But just how pervasive is this plastic problem? New research has found evidence of plastic pollution ranging from the deepest depths of the ocean all the way up to the remote Swiss mountains. Our plastic problem is, in all actuality, all around us.

Scientists have begun extensive research into plastics and their effect on the environment, and their research is becoming truly alarming. The most recent findings take us all the way down to the Mariana Trench, up through Point Nemo, the most remote point in the ocean, to the nature reserves of the Swiss mountains.

Over 10,000 m below sea level lies the Mariana Trench. Located just east of the Philippines, the Mariana Trench is the deepest section of the world’s oceans. A study published by the Global Oceanographic Data Center (GODAC) in Japan in April 2018 documented single-use plastic debris found in the trench as early as 1998.

The study also found that 92% of the plastic analyzed at depths greater than 6,000 m were made up of single-use plastics. Scientists claim to have found more chemical pollutants in parts of the Mariana Trench than some of China’s most polluted waterways, and as much as 17% of the debris was found with at least one organism – entangled, covered, or “attached”.

Another remote ocean area, Point Nemo, was discovered to have up to 27 microplastic particles per cubic meter. Point Nemo is nearly 1,700 miles from an inhabited island and deemed the “oceanic pole of inaccessibility”, yet plastics have seemed to find their way there.

And lastly, a study conducted by the Geographic Society of the University of Bern found that even in the most remote, unsettled mountain areas of Switzerland, whose recycling rate is nearly 100%, microplastics still pervade. Of the 29 floodplains studied, 90% of the soils contained microplastics, evidence of wind transport of plastic particles.

Evidence from this study has spurred even further research into microplastics, with increased concern with traces of plastic in soil, domestic livestock, and even agriculture.

It is becoming more and more apparent through studies such as these that action against plastic needs to happen immediately.

The extent of our plastic problem continues to expand and public concern is continuing to rise. There are many plastic alternatives out there to substitute for single-use plastics and regulation is continuing to expand, including the EU and the U.K.’s strategies to cut plastic pollution.

However, much and more needs to be done if we are to truly remedy the permeating and ubiquitous presence of plastic around the world.

Our Plastic Oceans

In the late 1980’s, large islands of floating trash seen by satellites were reported in the global news. Swirls of trash concentrated by the movement of the oceans’ gyres gave another hint to the then naïve public that our planet is finite after all. The world population—as of early 2018—is estimated at 7.6 billion; all contributing waste and debris to some extent.

Only one hundred years ago—when the world population had not yet reached 2 billion—trash was at worst unsightly or smelly but it was relatively harmless. Back then it eventually degraded and was not ultimately toxic to life.

In the early 1900’s, the first synthetic plastics were invented, giving way to the “plastic revolution”. As we found more uses for these new lightweight, cheap, and strong wonder materials, plastics rapidly found their way into most industries.

Today, plastics are a part of our daily lives and their prevalence can be a little overwhelming, especially when we are not welcoming them.

Our natural areas, waterways, and oceans have been polluted by plastic waste at an alarming level. It is at such an extent that gyres of plastic can be seen from space! It’s estimated that every square mile of ocean contains around 46,000 pieces of floating plastic.

While plastic debris is an eyesore and a threat to wildlife, the majority of the trash in the ocean is not even visible and poses its own threats.

A large portion of the plastic in the oceans is microplastics, composed of synthetic plastic particles so small they can barely be seen with the naked eye. The minute debris is so small and often suspended under the surface, making it invisible to satellites or even from the deck of a passing ship.

Microplastic pollution comes from countless sources, most prominently from cosmetic and household products, synthetic clothing fibers and industrial abrasives. Microplastics also result when larger pieces of plastic eventually break apart—not degrade, but break into smaller and smaller pieces.

Thin, single use plastics like disposable bags are one of the biggest offenders finding their way into our oceans.

Most plastics, when hit with UV radiation from the sun, begin to break down and gradually become microplastics over time.

A significant enough amount of microplastics now exist in marine environments to be detected in the bodies of fish sampled from different parts of the ocean. Fish and other marine creatures consume the microplastics, concentrating them in their bodies up the food chain. Humans included! People have tested positive as well for microplastics in their bodies.

Why does this matter?

Plastics are created from petroleum—hydrocarbons that when concentrated in the body are toxic. The liver and digestive system struggle and depending on the type and concentration of the synthetic particles many are known carcinogens. Synthetic substances, when regularly consumed, potentially contribute to disease due to a toxic cellular environment. The introduction of synthetic molecules into the Earth’s environment has created a toxic soup in the air, water and soil of the planet. The microplastic issue is just one aspect of the global pollution problem caused by humans! Life in many ways is now marinating in toxins.

What can I do about microplastics?

Avoid products that include plastics, especially microplastic particles. Most common brands of face scrubs, such as Neutregena and other Johnson & Johnson products, contain tiny plastic beads acting as abrasives. Skip those types of products, read the ingredients and avoid chemicals like Polyethylene (PE). This will help to reduce the amount of plastics being flushed through water treatment facilities which eventually end up in our water systems and potentially in wildlife.

Purchase natural fibers derived from plants when possible (e.g. cotton, bamboo or hemp).

Remember to bring—and use—reusable grocery bags. If you don’t have a good alternative to plastic bags, you can reduce your impact by reusing your “single use” plastic as many times as possible. Even using plastic bags as trash can liners is a valid way to reuse them and slightly reduce your environmental impact.

When purchasing anything, choose merchandise with minimal packaging and with the least amount of plastics as possible. Remember that you’re not only reducing your use of plastic by being selective but you’re also voting with your wallet – telling brands that excessively use plastic that you’re going to find an alternative.

All of our individual actions add up over time. Don’t forget that your daily actions DO make a difference!

Bans, Taxes, and Fees: The Politics of Plastic Bags

It has become common practice around the world to use disposable plastic bags to assist us in our every day lives. Out of mere convenience and utility, the plastic bag has become a go-to resource for in-store purchases, big or small.

However, in light of current of research pointing to the environmental impacts of plastic bags, many cities, states, and countries have sought to change this through regulation and legislation.

Impact of Plastic Bags on The Environment

According to the Earth Policy Institute, 1 trillion plastic bags are used worldwide each year. For every 100 billion plastic bags being made, 12 million barrels of crude oil are being allocated to their production. Equivocally, a car could drive for one mile on the energy required to produce 12 plastic bags.

And most of these are not being recycled. Instead, they are ending up in lakes and oceans, on beaches, in landfills, and even in our own food chain. This is because rather than breaking down over time, they are simply breaking into smaller and smaller pieces.

Legislation on Plastic Bags Around the World

Due to the mounting environmental concerns, legislation is being passed across the globe to mitigate the manufacture and use of disposable plastic bags. The first plastic bag law went into effect in Denmark in 1993, which implemented a tax on the use of plastic bags. Ireland introduced the Bag Tax in 2002, reducing plastic bag use by 90 percent.

Bangladesh became the first country to outright ban thin plastic bags in 2002 after two major floods in 1989 and 1998, which were magnified due to plastic bag waste blocking drains and sewers.

China began enforcing plastic bag bans and regulations in 2008, just before hosting the 2008 Summer Olympics. This eventually caused their largest plastic bag factory to shut down.

Other countries that have enacted regulations on plastic bags include Kenya, the Phillippines, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, and more.

Legislation on Plastic Bags in the U.S.

As of 2016, legislation regarding plastic bag bans spanned 23 states and included 77 bills. Notable city-wide bans are now enforced in Austin, Chicago, Seattle, and Cambridge, Massachusetts.

In 2014, California became the first U.S. state to ban disposable plastic bags statewide. Since then, a de facto statewide ban on plastic bags has been enforced in Hawaii, and the District of Columbia has passed a law banning the distribution of disposable, non-recyclable plastic bags.

However, many states in the U.S. have passed legislation prohibiting regulations on disposable plastic bags. Preemptive legislation that prevents cities, towns, or counties from regulating the sale and distribution of plastic bags is enforced in nine different U.S. states, including Arizona, Michigan, Florida, and Wisconsin.

What you can do about plastic bags…

The ban on disposable plastic bag use is gaining momentum and there are many ways you can contribute to this movement.

The most effective way to impose change is by writing your state representative. It is the job of your legislators to pass laws based on the values of their constituents. Voice your opposition to disposable plastic bags directly to those who can enact change.

In addition to directly contacting your representative, you can also make your voice heard through one of the many campaigns started to ban plastic bags, such as Greenpeace or Clean Up (The Project).

Sometimes the politics behind such a significant change can seem daunting. If you’re looking to promote change on a more local level, contact your local grocer to express your concern.

And finally, bring your own bag! By bringing your own bag to the store with you, you are easily able to say “No, thank you,” to plastic disposable bags when offered. Just because they are not legally banned in your city or state, doesn’t mean you have to use them.

The Environment This Week – September 17-24

The major trend from this week’s environmental news is no new trend at all. Those who are most effected by climate change are the smallest contributors to it. Those who are the biggest contributors are being asked to pony up, but as we already know, most of them will be getting off scot free.

Here’s what you need to know:

Trump rethinking stance on Paris Agreement?

Bloomberg news reported that the US is softening their stance on the Paris Agreement. In a recent meeting of 30+ countries discussing the climate accord, the EU climate chief Miguel Arias Canete, said that US wants to reingage the agreement from within rather than fully withdrawling.

The Whitehouse was quick to refute this… through Twitter of course:

Trump announced the US withdrawl from the Paris Climate Agreement in June.

But I wouldn’t be surprised if he reneged on his stance here too. He seems to have already given up on his party after their failure to repeal Obomacare and in an interview just last week Trump said “the wall will come later”.

 

Irma and Harvey call for a reality check

Scientific models are really really good. We can predict stuff like hurricane direction and intensity. Irma and Harvey – case in point. Why don’t we trust models to predict how our climate will change?

Models aren’t always right… But many of them are damn close.

Scientists have compared climate model predictions from the past, with actual data, and guess what? They are surprisingly accurate.

Blue Line: Prediction | Black Line: Data

Bottom Line: Climate models are accurate. The repercussions of climate change are devastating: intensified weather such as heat waves, flooding, droughts, and yep, you guessed it… hurricanes.

So while people evacuated and took cover based on weather predictions, a changing climate isn’t imminent enough for us to take action. It’s just so much easier to ignore science when it’s inconvenient.

 

300+ Companies Commit to Climate Targets

At the launch of Climate Week NYC today companies from around the world are announcing their commitment to carbon emissions reductions. The number of companies making such commitments has doubled since this event last year.

Climate Week NYC is an annual meeting of business, city, and state leaders. At the gathering they share why and how they are embracing a clean economy.

At least 50 of the companies attending are head quartered in the US.

Why is this important?

Companies are warming up to the fact that climate change is real and in order to have long term success they will need to adapt. The fact that the number of companies taking at least some action has doubled since last year shows some momentum.

How important is it?

As with many trends in business, once the early adopters show success from their new practices the rest will fall in a landslide. The private sector has an enormous influence on climate change and if some of the biggest corporations start acting it can have huge repercussions. Unfortunately, big business, like the giant it is, moves slow. I don’t expect to see any major reductions realized soon, but they may stack up quickly when they do.

 

Cities suing big oil

San Francisco and Oakland filed lawsuits against five oil and gas companies this week. SF expects the cost of climate change mitigation for the city to be about $5 billion this century as it responds to rising sea levels. Along with Oakland, Imperial Beach, Marin County and San Mateo County, San Francisco say the cost of global warming should be borne by those most responsible for it.

From the 3P: On Tuesday, both cities filed suits against a five oil and gas companies (Bay Area-based Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Shell and BP) that they say knew they were creating a climate crisis as early as the 1990s and “launched a multi-million-dollar disinformation campaign to deny and discredit what was clear even to their own scientists: global warming is real and their product is a huge part of the problem.”

 

Unfair Again: more hurricanes punishing the smallest contributors to climate change

Another storm, hurricane Maria, has come in quick succession of Irma and Harvey. This category 4 hurricane is the worst to hit Puerto Rico in 80 years.

Meanwhile, Barbuda is still reeling from Irma – the entire island was evacuated and 98% of buildings were destroyed. The Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda appealed to the larger nations of the UN for support this week.

In his speech, Gaston Browne noted that his country and other small nations are disproportionately impacted by the effects of global warming and larger nations should play a larger role in aiding them.

It seems logical that the nations contributing most to climate change should be doing the most to fix it. Unfortunately, politics are not very logical. Not only are countries like the US not leading the way to fix it, they’re also highly unlikely to help smaller countries develop the infrastructure needed to protect themselves from sea level rise and more intense storms.

 

Trump Pulls Out of Paris Agreement… The World Reacts

This week Trump announced that the US would be pulling out of the Paris Agreement… and some of the most influential people immediately responded. Here’s what they had to say:

Elon Musk

After staying on as Trump’s council despite their differences in opinion, Elon Musk has now stepped down. It seems that Trump’s decision to pull the US out of the Paris Agreement was the last straw.

Mayor of Pittsburgh – Bill Peduto

After Trump stated that he was elected to serve the people of Pittsburgh, not the people of Paris in his Paris pullout announcement, the mayor of Pittsburgh released a statement to clarify his stance: The city of Pittsburgh will follow the guidelines of the Paris Agreement.

Arnold Schwarzenneger

Good ol’ Arnold released a video directly addressing Trump to uphold his responsibility to protect the American people, part of which includes the health impact from pollution.

French President – Emmanuel Macron

Climate change is global… everyone is impacted and everyone needs to do their part.

 

Weekly Eco Summary: New High Score!

Feb 12 – 19

The Environment: Last week in short:

Last week researches published a study stating that we are changing the climate 170 times faster than natural forces. An unprecedented heatwave in Australia may be a hint of the extreme weather trends we can expect moving forward… and air pollution has become so bad in some cities that he health benefits of exercising outdoors are trumped by the negative impact of the pollution.

Oh ya, we’ve also reached the lowest lows – pollutants have been discovered in one of the most remote places on Earth: in the Marianas trench.

As our impact has reached a new high, politics continues to dip lower. This week Scott Pruitt was officially voted in by the senate to be the head of the EPA… Pruitt has a long history of suing the EPA and is expected to roll back the EPA’s enforcement efforts, further

Environmental highlights from last week:

Researchers quantified the impact humans have on the earth. It’s 170 times faster than natural forces.

Natural astronomical and geophysical forces such as Earth’s orbit around the sun, gravitational interactions with other planets, the sun’s heat output, colliding continents, volcanoes, and evolution, have driven a rate of change of 0.01 degrees Celsius per century.

Greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans over the past 45 years have increased the rate of temperature rise to 1.7 degrees Celsius per century, dwarfing the natural background rate. [Read More]

 

Australia’s heat wave has set new records (47 C, 116 F) for the Sydney suburb Penrith. Almost every Australian capital city experienced higher-than-average temperatures this January. Meanwhile, the Australian politician Scott Morrison brandished a lump of coal at parliamentary question time, declaring coal to be the future of Australian energy. [Read More]

 

Air pollution has reached a new high. New research suggests that in at least 15 cities, air pollution has now become so bad that the danger to health of just 30 minutes of cycling each way outweighs the benefits of exercise altogether. [Read More]

 

As Trump plans to pull the US out of the global climate agreement, Sweden vows to eliminate greenhouse gasses by 2045.

The law is expected to take effect in 2018. It would require the domestic transport sector to decrease its emissions by 70 percent by 2030. Domestic emissions are to be slashed by 85 percent, with the government setting new climate goals every four years. Any remaining emissions would be negated by investing in sustainable development projects abroad or planting trees to sequester carbon within the country. [Read More]

 

‘Extraordinary’ levels of pollutants were discovered in the Marinas trench. This 10km deep trench in the pacific ocean is considered to be one of the most remote places on earth… but not untouched. Scientists recently discovered the presence of manmade pollutants in crustaceans during an expedition. This discovery is important because it shows the extent of dispersal of known toxic chemicals. [Read More]

 

Things I didn’t know were a problem but are being solved…

Synthetic textiles, such as fleece jackets, send tiny plastic fibers into wastewater after washing. These bits eventually make their way into rivers, lakes and our oceans, where they pose health threats to plants and animals.

Two dudes came up with a solution: a mesh laundry bag, that goes into the washing machine. The bag captures shedding fibers as clothes are tossed and spun, preventing the fibers from escaping. [Read More]

 

Chemicals in sunscreen can damage coral reefs, and one Hawaiian senator has proposed a bill to ban sunscreens containing oxybenzone and octinoxate in Hawaii. [Read More]

 

Hey, are you new here? Get up to speed and stay up:

[mc4wp_form id=”747″]