Venice’s lagoon of 2,000 lost boats: the true cost of dumping small vessels

Venice’s lagoon of 2,000 lost boats: the true cost of dumping small vessels

Abandoned boats in the Venetian lagoon.

For decades, the city’s wetland has been used as a landfill for discarded wrecks, leaking microplastics and pollutants and posing a risk to others on the water

Paolo Cuman points to a rusty boat, half-sunk in Venice’s lagoon. “It has been there for years,” he says, laughing. “When I manage to have her removed, I’ll open a bottle of good wine.” Hunting abandoned boats is a hobby for Cuman, the coordinator of the Consulta della Laguna Media, a grassroots group monitoring the health of the lagoon. Once he’s found the boats, he maps them and pressures the authorities to remove them.

For decades, the Venetian lagoon – the largest wetland in the Mediterranean – has been used as a landfill by people wanting to get rid of their boats. An estimated 2,000 abandoned vessels are in the lagoon, scattered over an area of about 55,000 hectares (135,900 acres). Some lie beneath the surface, others poke above the water and some are stranded on the barene – the lowlands that often disappear at high tide.

The wrecks are a threat to other vessels – a boat’s engine may be damaged if it passes over them. But they are an even bigger threat to the ecosystem, leaking chemicals, fuel and microplastics as the boats disintegrate in the water.

Authorities seldom remove these wrecks; bureaucracy is slow and dealing with the city’s boat graveyards is a long way down the priority list. That’s why a group of boating enthusiasts and environmentalists, including Cuman, are trying to force action.

On a hot summer day, the lagoon, which is only a few miles away from the crowded streets of Venice, feels like a world away. Sailboats zigzag across the water, cormorants fly past and flamingos wade in the shallows, while fish leap in and out of the water.

Paolo Cuman looks for wrecks along the canals of the lagoon. He leads a grassroots organisation to monitor the health of the water.

Only the wrecks of abandoned vessels mar the scene. For the most part they are small, low-powered motorboats, or burci – transport boats widely used in Venice. These are “owned by ordinary people”, says Cuman.

He spots the relic of a vessel: “See this fishing boat? I remember when it used to bring the fish to Mestre [his neighbourhood] 40 years ago! Looks like it has been discarded for three decades at least,” he says.

The practice of illegally abandoning vessels in the lagoon dates back to the 1950s, when trucks began to replace boats for commercial purposes. “In the past, the large shipping companies abandoned the burci here, creating boat cemeteries,” says Giovanni Cecconi, president of Venice Resilience Lab, an environmental group that has contributed to mapping the lagoon.

“There are boats that have been abandoned for 20 or 30 years that are in very bad condition,” says Davide Poletto, executive director of the Venice Lagoon Plastic Free organisation. These release chemical contaminants as they break down, he says.

Modern boats tend to have fibreglass hulls, which release microplastics as they decompose. A big concern is anti-fouling paints, which are intended to keep slime, barnacles and other creatures off the boats. Some of these, such as tributyltin, are now banned because of their toxic effects on marine life. Even the boats’ furnishings and upholstery contain chemicals that may contaminate the water.

Yachts left to rot in the Venetian lagoon.

To a Venetian, owning a boat is almost like owning a car. But while a car might end up in a salvage yard, disposing of an unserviceable boat is complicated and expensive. Venice lacks the infrastructure to deal with unwanted boats; few facilities take them so many choose to abandon them.

The Venice lagoon is controlled by 26 different entities, which means it is not always clear who has responsibility.

“Even if a local policeman sees an abandoned boat on a sandbank, he cannot intervene to remove it, because it is not his jurisdiction,” says Paolo Ticozzi, a city councillor who says he has asked authorities to create a disposal site for abandoned boats, but has yet to receive an answer.

Consulta della Laguna Media says it is the only organisation mapping the wrecks, and that it only covers the northern part of the lagoon.

A half-sunken boat in the lagoon.

No attempt has been made to quantify the environmental impact of the vessels, according to Venice Lagoon Plastic Free.

“No one has thought of analysing the damage caused by boats that have been there for 20, 30 or even 40 years,” says Poletto. The association has funding to remove some of the wrecks and plans to collect and examine some of the sludge at those sites.

Venice is far from the only boat graveyard. About 3m shipwrecks of all kinds are scattered across the world, according to Unesco. In the UK, hundreds of boats lie abandoned along the coasts of Devon and Cornwall, according to a BBC report, which called the practice “the fly-tipping of the maritime world”.

In the US, a Washington state programme has removed about 900 abandoned boats from rivers since 2002. In 2021, Virginia created a working group to “coordinate an examination of the issues” around abandoned and derelict vessels.

“The situation must be evaluated case-by-case,” says the bioscientist Prof Monia Renzi. “Obviously, a boat that has just been sunk should be recovered, if technically possible, because it could release a large number of contaminants even from parts we don’t normally think of, like upholstery.”

It can be different for vessels that have been lying on the sea – or riverbed for many decades, where an ecosystem has formed around the ships: “Marine sedimentation above the wreck limits the spread of contaminants,” says Renzi, adding that removing some of the oldest wrecks could cause further damage.

A View of the Venetian lagoon seen from Mestre. To a Venetian, owning a boat is almost like owning a car.

When it comes to Venice’s lagoon, however, the best solution is usually to remove the wrecks regardless of their age, says Renzi, especially because shallow waters make recovery easier.

Bulky material like boats can reduce the water’s natural circulation, she says, damaging the wider ecosystem – the less water circulates, the more pollutants will stick around. These environments are “already under pressure, because they are highly exploited for fishing, so the possible transfer of contaminants can be extremely critical”, she says. It risks further damaging fish populations.

In Venice, however, activists have won a small victory. The authority responsible for water management in the Venetian lagoon, the Magistrato alle Acque, has agreed to remove some vessels in the coming months.

Cuman welcomes the news, but says a lot remains to be done.

It is not only a problem for the environment, he says, but also of transport within the lagoon: “Unbound boats are at the mercy of the wind and the current. If you pass over a sunken or semi-sunken boat, it can break the engine, causing considerable damage,” says Cuman. Broken-off boat parts floating on the currents can also cause accidents hundreds of miles from the wreck, he says.

Cuman wants more people to join his wreck-spotting missions. “If I convince others in this community to join me, then there will be a Venetian patrolling every spot of the lagoon. Ignoring us will become impossible.”

Citizen scientists are seeing an influx of microplastics in the Ohio River

PITTSBURGH — A group of citizen scientists have observed a substantial influx of nurdles — small plastic pellets about the size of a lentil — in the Ohio River, which provides drinking water to more than five million people.


“In the last few months, we’ve seen a huge surge in nurdles,” James Cato, a community organizer at the Mountain Watershed Association, told Environmental Health News (EHN) in November. “Where we’ve normally been detecting about 10 nurdles per sample, we’re now seeing 100.”

Cato and other citizen scientists have regularly conducted “nurdle patrol” since 2020, taking to the river in boats to collect nurdles from water and sediment samples. Their goal is to establish a rough baseline for how many and what types of nurdles are in the water before Shell opened its massive new plastics plant along the Ohio River in southwestern Pennsylvania.

But these particular nurdles represent just a tiny fraction of the microplastics plaguing the Ohio River and other freshwater bodies across Pennsylvania and the country. Nurdles, broken down pieces of plastic packaging, bottles, or bags, and plastic fibers used in synthetic textiles (like nylon) that are less than five millimeters long are considered microplastics.

What’s happening with the influx of nurdles in the Ohio River exemplifies how hard it is to track down the sources of such pollution and determine who is responsible for cleaning it up. And amid the confusion, scientists are just beginning to understand the consequences to wildlife and human health.

“When I started looking into this a couple years ago, freshwater environments weren’t really on the radar because most research on microplastics had been focused on marine environments,” Lisa Emili, a researcher and associate professor at Penn State University Altoona, told EHN. “That’s starting to change as we increasingly recognize that freshwater environments have the ability not only to transport microplastics, but also to accumulate them.”

Tracking down the source of plastic nurdles

Plastic nurdle pollution

A leaf along the Ohio River. Citizens scientists have seen an influx of the pollution.

Credit: James Cato

Plastic nurdle pollution

Nurdles found in the Ohio River by the Mountain Watershed Association.

Credit: James Cato

Shell’s plant, which came online in November, will produce up to 1.6 million metric tons of plastic nurdles every year to be used in many consumer products, including single-use plastic packaging and bags. But the influx of new nurdles showed up before the plant opened, and the nurdle patrollers think they’ve traced many of them to a different source.

“These nurdles are really tiny, about the size of a poppy seed and about an eighth the size of regular nurdles,” Cato said. That unique appearance allowed them to track a trail of them to an outfall on Racoon Creek, a tributary of the Ohio.

The outfall belongs to a company called Styropek, which manufactures expandable polystyrene pellets, or EPS — rigid plastic pellets that are later expanded with air to double their size, then used to manufacture insulation and packaging products similar to Styrofoam. According to its website, Styropek is the largest manufacturer of these pellets in North America.

“We found thousands of these nurdles downriver of Styropek’s outfall and just two upriver,” Cato said. “There were also lots of nurdles on the riverbanks — so much that it looked like snowfall, coating plants in white — and they basically formed a bull’s eye around the plant, so we’re pretty confident they’re coming from there.”

The groups first noticed the nurdles in September. As private citizens, they couldn’t investigate further without trespassing on Styropek’s property, so they alerted regulators at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). About a month later, the EPA referred them to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP), at which point the groups filed a complaint with that state agency and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission to ask them to investigate.

Their contact at the Fish and Boat Commission wanted to help, but didn’t think they had legal jurisdiction to do so. Jamar Thrasher, a spokesperson for the Department of Environmental Protection, said the agency had performed an inspection at Styropek about a week prior to receiving the complaint, and “found nothing floating near the facility’s outfall or in the stream and identified no violations.” Still, in response to the complaint, he said the agency “requested that Styropek develop and integrate a more expansive plastic pellet/nurdle housekeeping plan to prevent potential discharge through any outfalls.”

Styropek did not respond to numerous requests for comment. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection did not perform a follow-up investigation, perform any clean-up of the nurdles, require the company to perform any cleanup or issue any fines against Styropek.

Nurdle pollution is largely unregulated. There are no international regulations on it, but in 2022 the United Nations resolved to create an international treaty aimed at restricting microplastic pollution in marine environments. A draft of the rule is expected to be complete in 2024.

In the U.S., no agency is charged with preventing or cleaning up nurdle pollution — nurdles aren’t federally classified as pollutants or hazardous materials, so unlike oil spills or other toxic substances in waterways, the Coast Guard doesn’t clean up nurdle spills.

Most state governments don’t have rules in place related to nurdle monitoring or cleanup, and in other parts of the country, it has sometimes been unclear who bears responsibility for regulating its pollution, resulting in an alarming lack of cleanup when spills do occur.

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection spokesperson Lauren Camarda said nurdles are prohibited from entering waterways under Pennsylvania’s Clean Streams Law and the Solid Waste Management Act, both of which should enable the agency to hold polluters accountable for cleaning up nurdle spills.

Microplastics pervasive in fresh water 

Plastic pollution in oceans has gotten lots of attention, but researchers are now discovering that microplastic pollution in fresh water is also pervasive.

A study published by the nonprofit environmental advocacy group PennEnvironment in October found microplastics in all 50 of the “pristine” Pennsylvania waterways the group sampled — all of which are classified by Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection as “exceptional value,” “high quality” or Class A trout streams.

Research on microplastics in fresh water across the U.S. is still limited, but scientists have found microplastics nearly everywhere they’ve looked, including many waterways that feed the Great Lakes and the lakes themselves, rivers throughout Illinois, and California’s Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers.

Microplastics can kill fish and other wildlife that ingest them by making their stomachs feel full when they’re not, but emerging research suggests they can also enter fish through their gills or skin, poison their flesh and travel up the food chain, which has implications for other types of wildlife and human health.

“Microplastics piggyback other pollutants like bacteria, heavy metals, endocrine-disrupting chemicals and PFAS [per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, a.k.a. ‘forever chemicals’],” Emili said. “We know they’re not good for us, but unlike other pollutants, we don’t even know how to set maximum daily loads for microplastics to avoid health consequences because they come in all different sizes, chemical compositions and levels of toxicity.”

Nurdles account for a large proportion of microplastics in waterways — by weight they’re the second-largest source of micropollutants in the ocean (after tire dust).

Microplastics in human blood

microplastics human health

“The study that really scared everyone found microplastics in human blood.”

Credit: Oregon State University

Microplastics have been found virtually everywhere on the planet — from the top of Mount Everest, the highest elevation on Earth; to the Marianas Trench at the very bottom of the Pacific Ocean; in fresh rain and snow, in the cells of fruits and vegetables, in the bodies of animals and humans and even in placentas and newborn babies.

“But the study that really scared everyone found microplastics in human blood,” Emili said. That study, published in May 2022, was the first to detect microplastics in human blood. They showed up in 80% of people who were tested.

“This means we’re starting to see not just ingestion of microplastics by animals and people, but also absorption of really, really small microplastics at a cellular level.”

It’s not yet entirely known how having microplastics in our bodies and blood impacts our health, but other research suggests the pollution can damage human cells, while other scientists have hypothesized they could increase cancer risk and cause reproductive harm, among other health problems. And we do know that some of the toxic substances that piggyback on microplastics, like heavy metals, PFAS and endocrine-disrupting chemicals are associated with numerous health problems including higher cancer risk and reproductive harm.

Researchers are also worried that an influx of microplastics in fresh water has the potential to disrupt natural carbon cycles, further fueling the climate crisis, according to Emili.

“If we’re substituting plastics for something like natural sediment, microbes may gravitate toward them more than natural sources, which could upset the larger carbon sequestration cycle,” she explained. “We don’t know for sure, but this is also something we really need to look at.”

Plastic nurdle libraries

The groups doing nurdle patrol in the Ohio River are working with researchers at Penn State University to build a “nurdle library” — an index of the various nurdles they’ve collected with information about where each one came from and what it’s made of.

These libraries could help them quickly identify large quantities of nurdles they spot down the line. But there are many potential sources for nurdles spills, and identifying where each piece of plastic came from poses its own challenges.

“Nurdles start to degrade once they’re in the environment,” Emili explained. “The way they started out their life looking, chemically, is not necessarily what they’ll look like after degrading. That makes it harder to say for sure where they came from.”

In May of 2022, a train derailment outside of Pittsburgh spilled approximately 120,000 pounds of plastic nurdles into the Allegheny River (along with approximately 5,723 pounds of oil). The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection oversaw cleanup efforts conducted by contractors for Norfolk Southern Corporation, the owner of the rail line responsible for the spill.

The company estimated that 99% of the nurdles were recovered, according to the state agency, but the nurdle patrollers say they still regularly come across pieces of plastic they recognize from that spill. The company hasn’t yet been fined for the accident, and the activists worry that enforcement related to releases of nurdles is inadequate to deter them.

“The cleanup of this incident is ongoing and [the Department of Environmental Protection] DEP is reviewing revised plans for how the operator will clean up remaining pellets,” the agency’s spokesperson Lauren Camarda told EHN. “The remediation and DEP’s compliance and enforcement activities related to this incident are ongoing, and, as such, DEP has not yet assessed a civil penalty.”

A recent report by international conservation organization Fauna & Flora International noted that nurdle pollution isn’t something that can be controlled through individual consumers, and called for a “robust, coordinated regulatory approach from industry, governments, and the International Maritime Organization.”

“So far we haven’t seen satisfactory enforcement even for egregious violations,” Evan Clark, a boat captain and nurdle patrol leader with Three Rivers Waterkeeper, told EHN. “We’re going to keep an eye on Styropek, but for us the bigger picture is making sure we can get our regulators to do meaningful enforcement around plastics in our waterways.”

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

‘A drop in the ocean’: England bans some single-use plastics – but does it go far enough?

Single-use plastic items including cutlery and plates will soon be banned in England, the government has announced.

Each year, the country uses around 1.1 billion single-use plates and 4.25 billion items of cutlery, according to government estimates. Only 10 per cent of these are recycled.

Now, environment secretary Thérèse Coffey has confirmed that such items will be outlawed in England.

Similar bans are already in place in Scotland and Wales.

‘A plastic fork can take 200 years to decompose’

Plastic objects used for takeaway food and drink – including containers, trays and cutlery – are the biggest polluters of the world’s oceans, studies have shown.

“A plastic fork can take 200 years to decompose, that is two centuries in landfill or polluting our oceans,” says Coffey.

Billions of single-use plastic items are disposed of each year in England, rather than recycled.

England bans single use plastic

England is now set to ban single-use items including plastic plates, knives and forks.

The decision comes after a consultation by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) that took place from November 2021 to February 2022.

“I am determined to drive forward action to tackle this issue head on,” Coffey says.

“We’ve already taken major steps in recent years – but we know there is more to do, and we have again listened to the public’s calls.

“This new ban will have a huge impact to stop the pollution of billions of pieces of plastic and help to protect the natural environment for future generations.”

However, some campaigners have criticised the ban for its limited scope.

“Whilst the removal of billions of commonly littered items is never a bad thing – this is a very long overdue move and still a drop in the ocean compared to the action that’s needed to stem the plastic tide,” tweeted Megan Randles, a political campaigner at Greenpeace UK.

What items will be included in England’s single-use plastic ban?

The government is yet to release details of the single-use plastic ban.

On Saturday, more information will be announced about the objects included and where the ban will apply.

The ruling will cover plastic plates, bowls and trays used for food items consumed in a restaurant or cafe, the Daily Mail reports, but not in environments like supermarkets and shops.

What other European countries have banned single use plastic?

A similar ban has already been introduced in Scotland and Wales. In England, single-use plastic straws, stirrers and cotton buds were outlawed in 2020.

Green campaigners in England have criticised the government’s delay in bringing in the new measures.

The country lags behind the EU, which introduced a ban on single-use plastic items in 2021. The ruling prohibits the sale of common pollutants including straws, plastic bottles, coffee cups and takeaway containers on EU markets.

Although not in the EU, Norway also adopted the measures.

Further proposals have recently been made to ban miniature hotel toiletries, among other items, as part of the European Green Deal’s fight against packaging waste.

In Germany, plastic manufacturers will have to begin paying towards litter collections in 2025.

ClientEarth set to take Danone to court over its plastics footprint

ClientEarth set to take Danone to court over its plastics footprint

Danone owns brands including evian, Volvic, Activia and Actimel

The environmental law firm has today (9 January) confirmed its filing of a case at the Paris Tribunal Judiciaire, accusing Danone of flouting its requirements under the French Duty of Vigilance law. Danone has stated that it is “very surprised” by the move and “strongly refutes” ClientEarth’s claims.

This law was implemented in 2017. It requires large businesses headquartered in France to publish ‘vigilance’ plans each year, setting out the environmental and social risks and impacts of their operations, suppliers and subcontractors. The plan must be global in scope and cover all owned brands and subsidiaries. As well as identifying risks, plans have to include prevention and mitigation measures and information on how the company is implementing these measures and results delivered so far.

ClientEarth is arguing that, as a major plastic packaging producer and distributor, Danone should be obliged under this law to include measures on plastics pollution across the value chain. Danone sells products in more than 120 countries and, according to Break Free From Plastic, is one of the world’s ten largest plastic packaging producers. The campaign also dubbed Danone the top plastic polluter in Indonesia.

In announcing the case, ClientEarth does acknowledge that Danone has implemented a plan relating to plastics. However, it criticizes the corporate’s decision to focus on recycling after consumer use., citing stagnating plastic recycling rates in major economies in the Global North and poor recycling infrastructure development in the Global South. Danone is targeting 100% recyclable or reusable packaging by 2025 and its latest annual report reveals that a proportion of 81% has been achieved.

“Recycling is a limited solution as only 9% of plastics ever made have been recycled,” said ClientEarth’s plastics lawyer Rosa Pritchard. “It’s unrealistic for food giants like Danone to pretend recycling is the silver bullet.”

Without adequate recycling, ClientEarth is arguing, plastics pose an array of environmental risks. These include emissions associated with landfilling, dumping and burning, plus the impact of plastic pollution on nature and human health. Research is ever-evolving on this latter topic. One recent study at the University of Hull found that members of the general public are ingesting microplastics “at levels consistent with harmful effects on cells, which are in many cases the initiative event for health effects”. Effects include disruption to hormone imbalance, organ inflammation and allergic reactions.

ClientEarth also mentions the social impact of plastics. This includes exposure to chemicals in the production process and informal waste management space, particularly in low-income nations.

ClientEarth is asking Danone to measure its plastic use across the value chain, including logistics and promotions. It then wants Danone to map the impact that plastics have on the environment and on humanity across its entire value chain.

From there, the company would be able to update its plastic plan. ClientEarth wants a commitment to reduce absolute plastic use over time.

These measures could be forced by a court intervention or agreed upon outside of court. The court will decide when to hold an initial hearing in the coming weeks and will likely set a date in the first half of the year if it does decide that a lawsuit should be opened.

Supporting ClientEarth with this case are the non-profit Surfrider and NGO Zero Waste France.

Danone’s response 

edie approached Danone for a comment. A spokesperson said: “We are very surprised by this accusation, which we strongly refute. Danone has long been recognized as a pioneer in environmental risk management, and we remain fully committed and determined to act responsibly.”

The spokesperson went on to call Danone’s plastics targets “comprehensive”, covering reuse, recycling and alternative materials. They also noted Danone’s support of strong international agreements, through the UN, on a new plastics treaty: “Putting an end to plastic pollution cannot come from one single company and requires the mobilisation of all players, public and industrial, while respecting the imperatives of food safety. This is why we support the adoption, under the aegis of the UN, of a legally binding international treaty.”

Negotiators have until 2024 to finalise the treaty, following agreement on the broad terms last year.


© Faversham House Ltd 2023 edie news articles may be copied or forwarded for individual use only. No other reproduction or distribution is permitted without prior written consent.

Study: Most farmers recycle plastic waste, but burning persists

A new study has found that the majority of farmers recycle agricultural plastic waste, but illegal burning and burying still persists on some farms.

The survey of 430 farmers on their attitudes towards the disposal and management of agricultural plastic is part of current PhD research on microplastics in soils being carried out by Clodagh King at Dundalk Institute of Technology (DkIT).

The research, which also examined farmers’ awareness and perceptions of the impacts of microplastics and plastics on the environment, was recently published in the internationally-respected journal, Science of the Total Environment (STOTEN).

Clodagh King

Over 88% of farmers who took part in the survey said that they are concerned about the amount of plastic waste generated by agricultural activities.

Most farmers view agricultural plastics negatively because of their environmental impact, along with the cost and logistics involved in dealing with them.

The study concluded that most farmers recycle their agricultural plastic.

The rate of recycling carried out by farmers was dependent on a number of factors including the type of plastic involved, the cost of recycling, access to facilities and knowledge about what can be recycled.

However, some farmers “openly admitted” to burning and burial of plastic waste on their farms, which is not only illegal but damaging to the environment.

The researchers recommended that initiatives should be rolled out to educate farmers on how to recycle farm plastics properly.

Plastic waste

Large pieces of plastic which are not properly managed can disintegrate into microplastics and make their way into soils, surface and groundwater sources.

Around 58% of farmers were “relatively aware” of microplastic pollution, but overall felt that they were more knowledgeable about plastic pollution.

More farmers also believed that aquatic environments are at greater risk to plastic pollution than the terrestrial environments.

Clodagh King in the laboratory at DkIT

The study, led by Clodagh King, recommended that future research efforts must focus on plastic and microplastic pollutions in soils to inform policy and to create greater public awareness of this issue.

It also outlined that new research is needed into the economic and practical viability of biobased and biodegradable plastics for use in agriculture.

“The findings from our study suggest that combined efforts by governments, policy makers, and other stakeholders must be undertaken to reduce the plastic and microplastic problem, it’s an environmental problem that we collectively must come together to solve,” King said.

In Iceland, start-up founders invent new ways to tackle environmental crises

REYKJANES PENINSULA, Iceland — The electric red and green glow of the production facility resembles the Icelandic aurora borealis. Algae in their growth stage flow through hundreds of glass tubes that travel from floor to ceiling, all part of a multistep process yielding nutrients for health supplements. Soon, all parts of each alga will be used.

The facility, operated by Icelandic manufacturer Algalif, is a space of inspiration for Julie Encausse, a 34-year-old bioplastic entrepreneur. During a July summer storm, Svavar Halldorsson, an Algalif executive, was guiding her through a tour of the company’s newest facility on the Reykjanes Peninsula.

By the end of 2023, this new facility aims to triple its production. After Algalif dries the microalgae and extracts oleoresin, a third of this output then goes toward health supplements. Algalif has traditionally used the rest as a fertilizer. Now Encausse, founder and chief executive of the bioplastic start-up Marea, hopes to use that leftover biomass to create a microalgae spray that can reduce the world’s reliance on plastic packaging.

Her newest partnership with Algalif is part of a start-up network in Iceland that focuses on inventive and creative technologies to address the climate and sustainability crisis. The Sjavarklasinn (“Iceland Ocean Cluster”) network includes environmental entrepreneurs working across several industries.

Thor Sigfusson founded the network in 2012 after conducting research on how partnerships between companies in Iceland’s technology sector helped expand that industry. At the time, he found that the fishing industry was not experiencing the same collaboration or growth.

“Even though companies were in the same building together, fishing from the same quotas and facing similar challenges, they were closed off,” said Alexandra Leeper, the Iceland Ocean Cluster’s head of research and innovation.

Three cod hanging on the wall of the second-floor entryway are the first thing to greet any visitor to the Iceland Ocean Cluster. Lightbulbs shine from their centers, and the dried scales filter the light to fill the space with an amber glow. The precise design is one that underlines the group’s belief that using 100 percent of a fish or natural resource can give rise to innovative technologies.

Straddling the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Iceland experiences dramatic seasons in an ever-changing geologic theater. Glaciers sit atop active volcano zones — the island exists in the extremes. This also means that Icelanders face daily indicators of climate change, such as increased glacial runoff.

These visible impacts have given a heightened urgency to tackling environmental problems, fueling partnerships like the one between Encausse and Halldorsson.

“It will all work out in the end,” Encausse says to a rain-drenched Algalif employee in passing as she and Halldorsson discuss the facility’s building timeline. In Icelandic, this is a common phrase — “þetta reddast” — that people use to assure one another.

Learning to use all parts of a resource

Encausse and Marea co-founder Edda Bjork Bolladottir have partnered with the cluster for 2½ years. Encausse says that involvement was core to their company’s inception.

“There is a collaborative mind-set when being on an island,” she said. “We need to work together to survive, and this was passed from generation to generation.”

In a country about the size of Kentucky, the people of Iceland have had to learn how to guard their resources. Encausse has discovered that often means using 100 percent of any material — a lesson she’s now implementing in her work with Algalif. She created a food coating from Algalif’s leftover biomass, a product she’s named Iceborea — in a nod to the aurora borealis.

“We are repurposing it and making something with value that gives it another life to avoid using more plastic,” Encausse said. Once Algalif’s factory expands over the next year, it will have 66 tons of microalgae leftovers that Encausse’s company can tap each year.

When sprayed onto fresh produce, Iceborea becomes a natural thin film and a semipermeable barrier that can protect against microorganisms. Iceborea can either be eaten with produce or washed off, reducing the need for plastic packaging.

Female founders in the cluster

Reusing factory byproducts is an entrepreneurial trend in Iceland.

Take Edda Aradottir. She is the chief executive of Carbfix, a company capturing CO2 byproduct from the largest geothermal plant in Iceland, Hellisheidi, and injecting it into stone to be buried underground.

Carbfix’s successful trials have marked a global milestone for carbon sequestration. It also has received international recognition — and Aradottir’s leadership has already served as a model for growing start-ups and other founders in the cluster trying to tackle extensive environmental concerns.

“It’s inspiring to see that perseverance pays off,” Encausse said about Aradottir’s work.

Another Icelandic company, GeoSilica, harvests silica buildup from the Hellisheidi waste stream to make health supplements. GeoSilica reaches the Icelandic and European markets, and its chief executive, Fida Abu Libdeh, is also working with the Philippines to pilot her silica-removal technology to create similar sustainable factory processes.

A Palestinian from Jerusalem, Abu Libdeh moved to Iceland in 1995 at age 16, a transition she described as difficult because of the language barrier and the country’s small immigrant population. In 2012, she graduated from the University of Iceland after studying sustainable energy engineering and researching the health benefits of silica. That same year, she and Burkni Palsson co-founded GeoSilica.

Ever since moving to Iceland, she was impressed with how the country produced electricity through geothermal sources.

“I knew I was going to do something in connection with that in the future,” she said.

GeoSilica is not formally part of the Iceland Ocean Cluster, but the network it has fostered reflects the same collaborative approach. Abu Libdeh has worked with cluster companies and held investor meetings at its headquarters. It’s a place that founders want to be, she said, where they want to learn from each other even if they are competitors in their fields.

While there has been progress over the years, Abu Libdeh said, it’s still a challenge for women to enter this entrepreneurial space. In 2020, less than 1 percent of investment went to women-founded start-ups, according to a recent European Women in Venture Capital report.

Halla Jonsdottir, research and development lead and co-founder of Optitog, has based her start-up in the cluster for three years. Her company is creating equipment to increase the catch area of shrimp trawls without scraping the seafloor — technology that’s meant to reduce fuel demands and CO2 emissions while protecting the ocean floor.

As a female founder in the Icelandic fishing technology industry, Jonsdottir is a rarity. Leeper believes Jonsdottir may be one of the few women working in fishing gear innovation.

Jonsdottir says the cluster helped drive her growth. “They put emphasis on making us visible in a male-driven industry.”

Beyond Iceland

What began as a dozen start-ups in 2012 has now grown to more than 70 members and associated firms connected to the Iceland Ocean Cluster. Sigfusson has ignited the blue economy within Iceland, but his project’s reach has also gone global.

There are now four sister clusters in the United States, as well as one in Denmark and one in the Faroe Islands.

The Alaska Ocean Cluster, which was the first to follow the Icelandic model, has already accelerated policy change in the United States. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) proposed legislation last year to create “Ocean Innovation Clusters” in major U.S. port cities, which would provide grants along the U.S. coastline and the Great Lakes.

“I’ve learned a great deal from our friends in Iceland who created a roadmap of innovation and public/private partnership when they established the first Oceans Cluster in Reykjavik,” Murkowski said in an email. “I’ll continue to press upon my colleagues the significance of this legislation and the promise it holds for the modernization and resilience of our maritime economy.”

Back at the cluster house

At 12:30 p.m. on a July afternoon, the cluster’s first-floor food hall, Grandi Matholl, buzzes during a busy hour. Fish haulers dressed in oversized, waterproof waders eat on wooden benches alongside employees in professional suits. Attached to the Matholl is Bakkaskemman, a seating area with a glass window where visitors can watch fish being unloaded off ships. Every afternoon on a business day, there’s an online auction to sell the day’s catch.

Upstairs in her office, Jonsdottir works on her trawler technology. Later in the week, Encausse will use the meeting room space to meet with investors about Iceborea.

The pungent smell of cod lingers in Bakkaskemman. It’s etched into the paint, leaking from the histories of the walls. In 30 minutes, the auction will begin.

Sign up for the latest news about climate change, energy and the environment, delivered every Thursday

The Best Ziploc Bag Alternatives

Best Eco-Friendly Plastic Bags and More

One family of four can easily use hundreds, if not thousands, of plastic sandwich bags every year. While plastic bags like Ziplocs are convenient, they have a large impact on the environment. Not only is the plastic derived from crude oil and natural gas mining, but most Ziplocs aren’t recycled and end up sitting in landfills for years.

Many people are turning to Ziploc bag alternatives, like reusable sandwich bags made from non-plastic materials. But with so many brands claiming to be the most durable, sustainable reusable bag on the market, it can be difficult to understand which are truly the best for your needs. We’ve done the research to help you find the perfect Ziploc bag alternative for you.

Learn how we did our research or jump straight to our picks for the best reusable sandwich bags.

Background Information: Advantages of Using Eco-Friendly Bags

Our Methodology for Choosing the Best Ziploc Bag Alternatives

There are a few factors we looked at to determine the best eco-friendly reusable sandwich bags:

Sustainability

The three main factors of sustainability we reviewed are materials, the production process, and disposal.

First, the materials of these bags must be more sustainable than single-use plastic. We’ve prioritized bags made from natural materials like organic cotton, plant-based plastics, and more. Unlike plastic, these materials are not derived from fossil fuels. However, they still require energy to produce, so in order to actually become more sustainable than single-use plastics, you need to reuse these bags around 100 times. 

Second, when information was available, we reviewed the production process of the bag. We chose companies that take steps to make their production more eco-friendly, such as relying on renewable energy or obtaining third-party sustainability certifications.

Third, we prioritized Ziploc bag alternatives that can be recycled or composted when they wear out, rather than being sent to landfills. For bags that can’t be recycled or composted, we ensured that they’re strong enough to be reused for years.

Quality

We’ve chosen bags that are durable and well-made. After all, the more times you can use a bag, the more sustainable it becomes. 

We’ve also reviewed the functionality of each bag to ensure that it actually provides a usable replacement for plastic bags that is just as convenient as Ziplocs, if not more so.

Ethical Labor

Finally, our top Ziploc bag alternative recommendations are produced by companies with that adhere to stringent standards of ethical labor. This includes ensuring employees receive a livable wage and are provided with safe working conditions.

The Best Reusable Sandwich Bags

1. Best beeswax bags: White Ladle Beeswax Produce Bags

white ladle beeswax best reusable sandwich bags
Source: White Ladle
  • Material: Organic cotton, beeswax
  • Current price: $19.99 (3 pack)
  • Size: 8 x 7 inches
  • Phthalate and BPA-free
  • Leak-proof? No
  • Get these bags: Amazon

These reusable sandwich bags are made from organic cotton, meaning it was grown without any pesticides that harm human health or the environment. These bags are also GOTS-certified, meaning they’re colored using safe, low impact dyes. Mix that cotton with sustainably-sourced beeswax, and you have a stiff, bendable bag that you can simply fold over the top to close. The beeswax also provides these bags with a waterproof layer to help make cleaning a little easier.

Pros:

  • Made using GOTS-certified organic cotton.
  • All beeswax is sourced from sustainable, independent beekeepers.
  • Made using non-toxic, natural ingredients including organic cotton, beeswax, jojoba oil, and pine tree resin. 
  • White Ladle donates 5% of all profits from their sustainable kitchen goods to The Nature Conservancy.
  • White Ladle holds a number of certifications demonstrating their commitment to ethical labor standards in all their factors, non-toxic production, and sustainable practices. You can read more about their certifications and factories on their site.

Cons:

  • These bags don’t seal completely, as they’re just a fold-over top.
  • These may only last around 1-2 years of regular use before the beeswax coating begins to degrade and lose its “sticking power.” This can make it more difficult to fold and seal.

You can also shop for these Ziploc bag alternatives on the White Ladle website.

2. Easiest to clean: Urban Green Cloth Sandwich Bags

urban green cloth - best reusable sandwich bags
Source: Amazon/A. Lee
  • Material: Canvas exterior, PEVA interior
  • Current price: $19.99 (3 pack)
  • Size: 8 x 7 inches
  • Phthalate and BPA-free
  • Leak-proof? No
  • Get these bags: Amazon

These Ziploc bag alternatives are made from canvas! While cloth bags may sound like a bad idea for food, these bags feature a moisture-resistant interior. Better yet, you don’t need to clean these by hand. Simply throw them in the washing machine for a quick and easy clean.

It’s important to note that canvas, a fabric made from cotton, still takes a lot of water and energy to produce. In order for these bags to truly be more sustainable than a plastic Ziploc bag, it’s important to use them as many times as possible.

Pros:

  • Comes in a variety of patterns and colors.
  • Insulated, so it will keep your food cold with an ice pack inside.
  • Machine-washable and dishwasher safe.
  • Easy zip-to-close design makes it easier for small children to close. The zipper seal also helps you keep food inside the bag rather than spilled inside your backpack or lunch box.

Cons:

  • Not great for super liquidy foods – these are definitely not leak-proof.
  • We noticed that these can take a long time to dry. Luckily, the set comes with multiple bags so you’ll always have one on hand that’s dry.
  • Interior is made from PEVA, a type of plastic that gives the bag its water-resistant qualities. While PEVA is highly recyclable, it’s not compostable.

You can also find these bags on the Urban Green website.

3. Most sustainable: Juniperseed Mercantile Snack + Sandwich Cotton Bags

  • Material: Organic cotton
  • Current price: $19.99 (3 pack)
  • Size: Sandwich Bags: 7 x 7 inches, Snack Bags: 5 x 4 inches
  • Phthalate and BPA-free
  • Leak-proof? No
  • Get these bags: Earth Hero

Because of their simplicity – these are made from organic cotton alone – we’ve ranked these reusable sandwich bags as the most sustainable option. These reusable sandwich bags are made entirely from 100% organic unbleached cotton. Organic cotton is one of the most sustainable fabric options, as it is grown with far less water and with fewer carbon emissions than conventional cotton. Use these bags fewer than 100 times and you’ll break even with a plastic bag.

These simple bags feature a fold over closure just like traditional sandwich bags, helping keep them secure. You can store almost anything in these, although they’re not waterproof, so wet foods may be a no-go.

Pros:

  • Made from GOTS-certified food-safe organic cotton, so you can be sure these have a low environmental impact and won’t affect your health.
  • Easy to clean by simply throwing in the washing machine.
  • These bags are fully compostable at the end of their life.
  • You can choose from two size options, larger bags for sandwiches or smaller snack-sized bags.
  • All Juniperseed Mercantile items are shipped plastic-free in recyclable or compostable packaging.
  • Every product is handmade in their production studio in Littleton, Colorado, which is open to the public to promote ethical labor and transparency.

Cons:

  • Not leak-proof.

You can also buy these reusable sandwich bags on the Juniperseed Mercantile website.

4. Closest to a Ziploc bag: BioBag Compostable & Resealable Sandwich Bags 

biobag resealable sandwich bags - Ziploc bag alternative
Source: What’s Good
  • Material: Mater-Bi (bioplastic)
  • Current price: $7.99 (25 pack)
  • Size: 6.5 x 6.7 inches
  • Phthalate and BPA-free
  • Leak-proof? Yes
  • Get these bags: Amazon

These bags are as close as you can get to a regular Ziploc bag while still reducing your plastic use. BioBag’s sandwich bags are made from Mater-Bi, a family of bioplastics made from plant starch, vegetable oil, and other compostable materials. As a result, these bags are fully compostable and biodegradable (although they should be composted in a commercial composting system, not at home!).

These plant-based Ziploc bag alternatives keep your food fresh due to their resealable closure. They’re also waterproof and leak-proof, making them a great fit for any liquidy foods like fruit and veggies. That said, the bioplastic material is still breathable, so you may not want to use these for long-term food storage or for storing pure liquids like soup stocks.

Pros:

  • Fully resealable and leak-proof.
  • Made from a resin made from GMO-free plant crops.
  • These bags have been certified compostable by the Biodegradable Products Institute and regulatory standard ASTM D6400 (meaning they’re guaranteed to compost quickly and safely).
  • Ships in plastic-free, recyclable packaging
  • These bags are affordable and are only slightly more expensive than Ziploc counterparts.

Cons:

  • These bags are still single-use, so even if they’re more sustainable to dispose of than plastic, they’re likely less sustainable than buying reusable bags you use over and over again.
  • We noticed that these bags are somewhat delicate and rip easily. Handle them carefully for best results.
  • These bags are not recommended for use in the freezer and should be stored away from heat. When exposed to extreme temperatures, we’ve noticed these bags start to break down.

You can also buy these reusable sandwich bags on EarthHero or the BioBag website.

5. Most versatile: Stasher Starter Kit

stasher starter kit - Ziploc bag alternative
Source: Amazon/AmartiO
  • Material: Silicone
  • Current price: $65.09 (7-pack)
  • Size: Variety
  • Phthalate and BPA-free
  • Leak-proof? Yes
  • Get these bags: Stasherbag.com

These compact food storage bags are made from food-safe silicone, which provides them with their extreme flexibility and durability. These bags can do it all. Not only are these bags microwave and freezer-safe, but they can go in the oven up to 400 degrees Fahrenheit. Silicone is nonporous, making them easy to clean, even in the dishwasher. Finally, these bags are thick enough that you can use them over and over again without fear of breakage.

The 7-Pack Starter Kit comes with a variety of shapes and sizes, from a small “Pocket Stasher” (4fl oz volume) to a half-gallon bag. You’ll be able to store everything you need and more! You can also buy sandwich bags individually or check out their Storage 4-Pack, which features four larger bags.

The main sustainability benefit of these bags is that they reduce your plastic waste; Stasher estimates that buying the seven-pack replaces around 1,820 plastic bags every year. However, it’s important to note that silicone isn’t the most eco-friendly material. While silicone is mainly made from silica, a substance found in sand, its production still requires petroleum. It’s also difficult to recycle. However, silicone is non-toxic, and lasts much longer than plastic. By buying high-quality silicone products like Stasher bags that can last for ten years, you still help reduce the amount of plastic that ends up in landfills. You just need to make sure you actually use them frequently.

Pros:

  • Fully resealable and leak-proof.
  • Extremely durable.
  • Silicone bags don’t store odors.
  • Comes in a huge variety of colors, shapes, and sizes.
  • Ships in boxes or envelopes made from recycled content that are 100% recyclable.
  • Stasher is a Certified B Corporation and a member of 1% For the Planet, so you can feel good supporting a company that takes ethical and sustainable practices seriously. They’re also a California Certified Green Business.
  • Stasher’s manufacturing facilities are SA8000 certified, meaning they undergo regular social audits to ensure safe and fair working conditions.

Cons:

  • These bags are made from silicone, so they’re not biodegradable and are hard to recycle.
  • Unlike some silicone bags, these are made without sealants. While this helps protect your health, it also means that the bags may stain with certain food types. To get rid of stains, rinse the bag with baking soda and vinegar.
  • These bags are pricey, but last a long time.

You can also buy these reusable sandwich bags on EarthHero or Amazon.

Learn More

Plastic Bottle Alternatives: Best Eco-Friendly Water Bottles

Every hour, Americans throw away 2.5 million plastic bottles. In a year, this adds up to enough plastic bottles to circle the Earth four times! Unfortunately, production of plastic bottles contributes to climate change. To make matters worse, most of these single-use plastic bottles aren’t recycled, and instead, sit in landfills for hundreds of years.

Choosing an eco-friendly water bottle not only reduces your environmental footprint, but it can also save you money and keep your beverage at preferred temperatures for hours on end. Stocking up on one (or several) of the best eco-friendly water bottles available today can be a great way to reduce single use plastic consumption and stay hydrated in style. In this blog post, we will look at six of our top picks for the best eco-friendly water bottles that are both high-quality and Earth conscious.

Keep reading to learn how we picked the most eco-friendly water bottles, or jump straight to our product recommendations.

How Did We Find the Best Plastic Bottle Alternatives?

We kept several criteria in mind when reviewing plastic bottle alternatives. All the reusable water bottles we’ve chosen are made from eco-friendly materials, are non-toxic, and are produced using ethical labor. Of course, these water bottles are also of the utmost quality and function.

Eco-Friendly Materials

It is important to be aware of the materials used to produce reusable water bottles because some are more environmentally friendly than others. Glass and stainless steel are two of the most eco-friendly materials used in reusable water bottles, while plastic and aluminum are among the least. We chose bottles made of:

  • Stainless steel: Stainless steel is durable and long lasting so it won’t need to be replaced often, and it can also be recycled after its life has ended.
  • Glass: Glass is a completely natural material that can be recycled, reused, and repurposed infinitely without any loss in quality.
  • Plant-based materials: These are compostable and made using materials like rice husks, wheat, or bamboo. 

Sustainable materials aren’t the only thing that makes a water bottle eco-friendly. We’ve also prioritized water bottles made by companies that incorporate sustainability into other areas of their business, such as ensuring their products are carbon neutral.  

Non-Toxic

Some plastic-based bottles contain chemicals that are harmful to the environment and human health. All of the products we chose are free of toxic chemicals including:

Socially Responsible

We chose eco-friendly bottles made by companies with a strong adherence to ethical labor standards. Most of the companies we feature are B-Corporation certified. A B-Corporation certification is a designation given to businesses that have met the highest standards of social and environmental performance, accountability, and transparency. The designation is awarded by the nonprofit organization B Lab, which evaluates companies based on their commitment to workers, customers, community, and environment. 

High-Quality

When switching to a plastic bottle alternative, it’s important to make sure it’s something you’ll actually use. That’s why we’ve picked water bottles that people love using. Every bottle on our product recommendation list is convenient to use, easy to clean, and fits in a car cup holder.

6 Best Eco-Friendly Water Bottles

Here are the 6 best eco-friendly water bottles, organized by material.

Stainless Steel Eco-Friendly Bottles

Glass Eco-Friendly Bottles

Plant-Based Eco-Friendly Bottles

Top Picks

Stainless Steel Eco-Friendly Bottles

Stainless steel is ultra-durable and recyclable. Here are our top two stainless steel picks.

1. United by Blue – Stainless Steel Bottle

  • Material: Stainless steel
  • Volume: 22 Oz
  • Fits in a cup holder? Yes
  • Insulated? Yes
  • Non-toxic? Yes
  • Current price: $34

United by Blue’s insulated water bottles are made of 100% stainless steel, making them 100% recyclable. Additionally, producing these water bottles releases zero toxic runoff.

These eco-friendly bottles come in a variety of beautiful patterns, from citrus fruits to an abstract shape painting. Each bottle also comes equipped with a strap that can clip around your wrist or backpack for secure carrying.

We noticed that this bottle’s lid is truly a standout. It’s vacuum sealed and the lid mechanism makes it difficult to spill.

Pros:

  • Bottle features double-wall insulation, keeping your drinks cold for 24 hours, or hot for 12.
  • United by Blue removes one pound of trash from oceans for every product purchased.
  • The company is climate neutral, meaning they have net zero carbon emissions.
  • United by Blue is a certified B Corporation, which demonstrates their commitment to ensuring ethical labor practices throughout their supply chain.

Cons:

  • Hand-wash only.

You can also find United by Blue water bottles on Amazon and EarthHero. Looking for another size? United by Blue also sells a larger 32 oz version, in addition to a smaller 18oz version.

2. Klean Kanteen – Classic Insulated Water Bottle

klean kanteen - best eco friendly water bottles
Source: Amazon/Anthony S. (Sticker not included).
  • Material: Stainless steel, plastic lid
  • Volume: 20 Oz
  • Fits in a cup holder? Yes
  • Insulated? Yes
  • Non-toxic? Yes
  • Current price: $31.37

Klean Kanteen has been leading the charge for plastic bottle alternatives since 2004, when they became the first manufacturer to create a BPA-free stainless steel bottle. Since then, they’ve become a leader in the eco-friendly water bottle world.

The Klean Kanteen Classic is Klean Kanteen’s original best-selling water bottle, but now it comes fully insulated. The leak-proof cap is easy to clean as there are no hidden nooks and crannies. It also features a convenient carrying handle. We love how strong the stainless steel is- the Klean Kanteen Classic can handle the wear and tear of everyday life without denting or leaking.

Pros:

  • All of Klean Kanteen’s products are backed by a Lifetime ‘Strong as Steel’ warranty.
  • Keeps your drinks hot for 20 hours and keeps your drinks cold for up to 50 hours.
  • Available in plain stainless steel and in a variety of bright colors that are chip-resistant.
  • This bottle is dishwasher safe.
  • Compatible with multiple lids.
  • Klean Kanteen is a certified B Corporation.
  • Klean Kanteen is climate neutral, and donates 1% of their earnings to environmental organizations.

Cons:

  • We noticed that this bottle is a bit harder to open than some others. Avoid opening the bottle by pulling on the handle loop, as this makes it difficult to open and may hurt your hands.

Klean Kanteen’s insulated water bottles are also available in a 12oz version. While the brand also makes a non-insulated version of the Classic for a lower price, we think the long-lasting temperature control is worth paying a bit more.

You can also find them on Klean Kanteen’s website.

Glass Eco-Friendly Bottles

Glass is one of the most sustainable materials, as it’s infinitely recyclable. In fact, every ton of recycled glass saves 670 kgs of carbon dioxide (the equivalent of flying from New York to LA and back). Glass is also non-toxic and chemically-inert, so it doesn’t retain flavors or odors.

3. SOMA – Glass Water Bottle

soma - plastic bottle alternatives
Source: Amazon/JLF
  • Material: Glass, silicone sleeve, bamboo lid
  • Volume: 25 Oz
  • Fits in a cup holder? Yes
  • Insulated? No
  • Non-toxic? Yes
  • Current price: $34.99

These glass bottles from sustainable company SOMA feature a silicone sleeve that helps protect the glass from damage and makes it easier for you to carry the bottle. While silicone isn’t the most sustainable material, we think it’s worth it to avoid dropping these bottles.

While we love the simplicity of the bamboo cap, you can also purchase other compatible lids, such as a bamboo lid with a silicone handle for easy carrying or the Sport Cap, which has an ergonomic mouth design, aluminum handle, and flip top lid.

Pros:

  • The bottle comes in multiple colors including white, charcoal, pink, and mint.
  • For every SOMA purchase, they donate to projects working to end the global water crisis.
  • SOMA offsets their carbon emissions through supporting forestry initiatives.
  • This bottle comes packaged in recyclable materials.
  • SOMA is B-Corporation certified and has a strong code of conduct that sets standards for sustainability, labor practices and transparency.

Cons:

  • This bottle is fragile. A few reviews note that their bottle broke after falling over.
  • This bottle doesn’t keep drinks cold for as long as an insulated bottle does.

This bottle is also available in a 17 oz version. You can also buy the bottles on the SOMA website.

4. Urban Green – Glass Water Bottle with Silicone Sleeve

  • Material: Glass, silicone sleeve, bamboo lid, and stainless steel lid
  • Volume: 18 Oz
  • Fits in a cup holder? Yes
  • Insulated? No
  • Non-toxic? Yes
  • Current price: $15.99

This glass bottle from Urban Green also features a silicone sleeve available in multiple colors. We noticed that the bottle does a better job of keeping your drinks cold than some glass bottles because the sleeve covers the entire bottle, rather than just part. This bottle also comes with two lids, a bamboo lid and a stainless steel lid with a convenient carrying strap.

Additionally, the Urban Green glass bottle is highly affordable compared to other reusable bottles of its caliber while still providing the same level of quality and convenience. 

Pros:

  • While the silicone lid is hard to get on and off, you can simply put the whole bottle, sleeve included, in the dishwasher to clean.
  • Semi-transparent, so you can see how much water you have left.
  • This bottle is fairly durable, considering it’s made of glass. Several reviews note dropping the bottle without causing breakage.
  • Silicone sleeves are available in multiple color options including white, pink, purple, light blue, green, and black.

Cons:

  • This bottle is a bit smaller than our other picks at 18oz.
  • While Urban Green sells products meant to help us reduce our plastic footprint, they don’t offer a lot of information about other sustainable practices.

You can also find this bottle on the Urban Green website, although they’re often sold out.


Plant-Based Eco-Friendly Bottles

Plant-based water bottles are made from a variety of materials made from plants, including wheat, rice husks, and more. Here are the best plant-based eco-friendly bottles.

5. S’wheat – S’wheat bottle

s'wheat bottle - plastic bottle alternatives
Source: Mashable
  • Material: Bamboo fiber and wheat straw
  • Volume: 19.03 Oz
  • Fits in a cup holder? Yes
  • Insulated? Yes
  • Non-toxic? Yes
  • Current price: $31

These plant-based water bottles are made from bamboo fiber and wheat straw – thus the name, “S’wheat.” Despite being plant-based, this water bottle is ultra-durable, as the material is temperature resistant. Better yet, the S’wheat material is insulated, so this eco-friendly bottle will keep your drinks hot or cold for longer.

We love this bottle’s sleek design and slide-to-close lid. We also love that it comes with a handy steel traveling clip so you can simply clip the bottle to your backpack. The S’wheat bottle comes in four color options: bright blue, light green, oat, and black. 

Pros:

  • S’wheat plants a tree for every bottle sold. You even get to track the growth of your traceable tree! They also remove 20 pounds of plastic from the ocean for each bottle sold.
  • This bottle ships in plastic-free, recyclable packaging.
  • You can put hot or cold beverages in this bottle.
  • This bottle is very lightweight, especially compared to glass or stainless steel.

Cons:

  • Hand-wash only. It’s recommended that you wash this bottle every three days.
  • This bottle isn’t suitable for fridge or freezer use.
  • Don’t put carbonated beverages in this bottle.

The S’wheat bottle is available only on their website.

6. Yuhme – The Power Water Bottle

  • Material: Sugar cane
  • Volume: 25.3 Oz
  • Fits in a cup holder? Yes
  • Insulated? Yes
  • Non-toxic? Yes
  • Current price: $30

These eco-friendly water bottles are made entirely from sugarcane! Sugarcane is a renewable resource that’s not only carbon dioxide negative (sugarcane absorbs carbon dioxide), but is also fully recyclable. While these bottles are made of sugarcane, they look like a hard plastic – and have the durability of plastic as well.

Yuhme’s water bottles come in a variety of colors and patterns, so you’re sure to find the perfect bottle for you. Its wide mouth makes filling up fast and easy, while its flip top lid provides a great seal.

Pros:

  • These bottles are 100% recyclable at the end of their lifecycle.
  • For every ton of bio-plastic (sugar cane plastic) produced, 2.4 tons of carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere.
  • Yuhme bottles are quite durable and available in a variety of colorful patterns.
  • Yuhme partners with the non-profit Water for Good. Every bottle sold provides three months of clean drinking water to people in the Central African Republic.
  • These bottles are dishwasher safe.

Cons:

Top Picks

Having trouble making a decision? Here’s our top picks for a few different categories.

Most Durable: Klean Kanteen

Klean Kanteen’s stainless steel insulated water bottles are famous for their durability. Even the outside powder coat finish is chip-resistant. Plus, Klean Kanteen offers a lifetime warranty on their products.

Best Patterns: United by Blue

United by Blue’s eco-friendly bottles stand out for their variety of artfully designed patterns. They have one for everyone!

Most Affordable: Urban Green

At $15.99, Urban Green’s glass bottle is the most affordable option. That said, it is a little smaller than other options at 18 oz of capacity.

Best Overall: S’wheat

The S’wheat plant-based bottle is super sustainable, extremely durable, and includes nice features like a slide-to-close lid and a carrying clip. At almost 20 oz, it’s a great medium size that makes travel easy while still holding enough water. Plus, S’wheat donates to several great causes.

6 Best Reusable Nylon and Polyester Shopping Bags

A Complete Guide to Sustainable Reusable Bags Made From Synthetic Fibers

Ready to make the switch from single-use plastic shopping bags? We’ve got you covered. Reusable nylon and polyester shopping bags are some of the most popular and reliable options when it comes to reducing your environmental footprint – not only do they look great, but they come in a range of sizes so you can keep them handy for any errand. In this post, we round up 6 of our favorite nylon and polyester bags on the market today so all eco-conscious customers can find one that suits their needs and lifestyle perfectly.

Keep reading to learn how we made our choices, or jump straight to our product recommendations.

Background Information: How to Find the Best Reusable Grocery Bags for You

nylon and polyester reusable bags

How We Picked the Best Sustainable Nylon and Polyester Bags

Synthetic fibers like nylon and polyester are derived from plastic. However, using reusable bags made of synthetic fibers can be more eco-friendly than using single-use plastic bags when they are made from recycled materials and used as many times as possible. 

We’ve scoured the market to find the best reusable bags made from synthetic fabrics. All our picks are sustainable, ethical, and high-quality. Here are the criteria we used to determine the best nylon and polyester reusable bags.

Capacity

One of the most critical qualities of a good reusable bag is that it can carry everything you need it to. The bags we’ve chosen are large enough for most grocery trips, but not so big that they’re inconvenient.

Materials 

To ensure that these bags are as eco-friendly as possible, we chose bags that are made from recycled synthetic fibers instead of bags made from virgin plastic (synthetic) materials. This helps reduce the amount of carbon emissions from production. Materials include:

  • Recycled PET or Polyester
  • Recycled Nylon

Keep in mind that even recycled synthetic fiber bags are still constructed of non-biodegradable materials and still emit carbon to produce. In order to offset the environmental costs of each bag’s production, you’ll need to reuse the bag around 35 times

Read more about these materials and their benefits and drawbacks: What Are Reusable Bags Made Of?

Quality & Durability

The more durable a bag is, the longer its lifespan, making it more sustainable because you won’t have to replace it as frequently. Of course, durability is also great for those extra-large grocery trips. We validated the quality and durability of each of these bags to ensure that our top picks do not break easily or decrease in quality over time.

Manufacturer’s Ethical & Sustainable Practices

We also evaluated each manufacturer’s ethical practices and other sustainability efforts. We researched whether they provide a safe and ethical workplace, as well as fair wages, and if they participate in programs that directly benefit the environment.

Reusable Bags Made of Nylon and Polyester: Our Top Picks

Today, only 8 states in the United States have banned single-use plastic bags: California, Delaware, Connecticut, Maine, Hawaii, Oregon, New York, and Vermont. While many grocery stores in other states continue to use single-use plastic bags, you can still reduce your own plastic footprint by bringing a reusable bag with you. Here are our selections for the best sustainable reusable bags made of synthetic fibers.

Best Polyester Reusable Bags

Best Nylon Reusable Bags

Our Top Rankings

Best Polyester Reusable Bags

1. Glob – Primary Morph Ripstop

glob primary morph ripstop - nylon reusable bags
Source: Facebook/Glob
  • Manufacturing Company: Glob
  • Amazon Star Rating: N/A 
  • Current Price: $36
  • Materials: 100% recycled polyester ripstop
  • Dimension: 13″ H x 11 1/2″ W x 18″ L
  • Get This Bag: Glob

Glob’s reusable tote bag is made of recycled polyester ripstop made from plastic bottles. Each of these bags stops 10 plastic bottles from entering landfills or the ocean. 

This bag is water resistant and extremely lightweight, yet also durable. But the most impressive feature of this reusable polyester tote bag is its ability to transform from a small folded pouch to a spacious tote bag with 6 outer bottle compartments. Its size and multiple compartments make this bag ideal for storing various grocery items inside and out in a very organized way. It also features a zipped inside pocket to keep your phone, wallet, or credit cards safe and secure. There are two pairs of straps attached to this reusable bag: one is long for shoulder carrying and one is short if you prefer to carry the bag by hand. 

Glob’s sustainability efforts extend beyond recycling plastic water bottles to produce reusable bags. Every month, the company donates 1% of its sales to CoalitionWILD, an organization that provides resources to youth to learn how to drive positive environmental change. 

This bag is available in Glowstick (neon green), Puff (purple), Dune (light brown), Slice (orange), Hyperlink (blue), Void (black), Bubble (pink).

Downsides: The only downside is that this bag is more expensive than a conventional polyester tote. But conventional bags aren’t made from 10 plastic bottles!

2. Patagonia – Black Hole® Tote 25L

patagonia black hole tote 25L - polyester reusable bags
Source: shopperboard
  • Manufacturing Company: Patagonia
  • Amazon Star Rating: 4.9
  • Current Price: $129.90
  • Materials: 100% recycled polyester ripstop
  • Dimension: 13.89″ H x 17.2″ W 
  • Get This Bag: Amazon

Patagonia’s reusable tote bag is made of 100% recycled polyester ripstop and is Fair-Trade certified. The Black Hole Tote is sturdy and durable and is even completely waterproof, making it perfect for grocery shopping in any weather conditions. We’ve also noticed that the polyester ripstop on this bag is thicker than other polyester reusable bags, helping the bag last longer even with frequent use. It also contains interior stash pockets to keep your smaller things safe. 

Patagonia has pledged 1% of its sales to preservation and restoration of the natural environment through its “1% for the Planet” environmental initiative. They’ve also built robust environmental and animal welfare programs that all their production adheres to. Patagonia earned a “Good” rating on the good on you directory for their sourcing of eco-friendly materials and maintaining an ethical and transparent supply chain.

This bag is available in blue, black, and maroon.

Downsides: This bag is fairly expensive compared to the other polyester reusable tote bags on our list. 

You can also get this bag on Patagonia’s website.

3. ChicoBag – VITA rePETe Tote Bag

  • Manufacturing Company: ChicoBag
  • Amazon Star Rating: 4.5
  • Current Price: $14.50
  • Materials: Polyester
  • Dimension: 12.5″ H x 19″ W 
  • Get This Bag: Amazon

ChicoBag’s VITA rePETe reusable tote bag is one of the most eco friendly bags among our top recommendations. The fabric of the bag is 100% polyester made from recycled plastic bottles, and the carabiner attached to the bag is 78% recycled aluminum. Moreover, the company has invested in programs that offset the carbon released from the production of their bags, making their bags entirely carbon-neutral.

This reusable polyester bag has a simple and modern design. When not in use, it can be stored as a compact bag sealed with a cord lock. When you need the bag, simply unfold it, and you have a large durable bag that’s strong enough to hold up to 40 pounds of groceries. It also contains an internal compartment to keep your smaller items safe inside the bag.

In addition to their sustainable business practices, ChicoBag is also B Corp certified, which means they meet high standards of ethical responsibility in all areas of their business. Furthermore, the company is also a member of the 1% for the Planet organization, which donates 1% of the company’s profit to support various environmental nonprofits and organizations.

This bag is available in Serenity (violet), Zen (green), and Clarity (light blue).

Downsides: We’ve noticed that since this bag doesn’t have a flat bottom, you may want to avoid putting bottles with leaky lids inside to avoid the risk of spillage. 

You can also find this bag on the ChicoBag website.

4. Envirosax – Reusable Grocery Bag

envirosax - polyester reusable bags
Source: Pinkoi
  • Manufacturing Company: Envirosax
  • Amazon Star Rating: 4.8
  • Current Price: $14.95
  • Materials: Polyester
  • Dimension: 16. 5″ H x 19. 5″ W
  • Get This Bag: Amazon 

Envirosax’s reusable grocery bag is made of 100% recycled polyester fabric. According to Envirosax,  recycled polyester requires 59% less energy to produce and produces 32% less emissions compared to conventional polyester.

We’ve noticed that this bag is lighter than our other top recommendations, yet it can still hold up to 44 pounds of goods. When not in use, you can simply roll this bag and store it in your purse or backpack. One thing that separates this bag from the others is also the variety of artistic designs printed using non-toxic, eco-friendly dye. If you’re an artsy person or like a little flare in your outfit, this brand might be the best for you! You can check out Envirosax’s wide variety of design options on Amazon or their website

Downsides: We’ve discovered that when washed repeatedly or in a washing machine, the print may fade over time. 

You can also find this bag on the Envirosax website.

Best Nylon Reusable Bags

5. Big Baggu

  • Manufacturing Company: Baggu
  • Amazon Star Rating: 4.8
  • Current Price: $18
  • Materials: Nylon
  • Dimension: 33″ H x 18″ W
  • Get This Bag: Amazon

The Big Baggu reusable tote bag is constructed of 100% recycled ripstop nylon. At 33 inches tall and 18 inches wide, this reusable bag is one of the most spacious bags on our top picks, making it ideal for bulk shopping. It is also durable and strong enough to carry up to 50 pounds of goods. When not in use, this bag can also be folded into a pouch that can even fit in your pockets. 

Baggu is committed to reducing waste in production, which is why, in addition to producing items made entirely of recycled materials, the company has also discarded plastic packaging in favor of FSC-certified 100% recycled paper stock with non-plastic recyclable coatings. Baggu also received a “Good” rating for sustainability on the good on you directory.

This bag is available in a variety of colors and patterns. You can check out the design options and availability on Amazon or their website

Downsides: We noticed that this reusable bag lacks an internal pocket, which can be an important feature for keeping your vital items safe. This bag may also be excessively large for a smaller person; if you have a small frame, it can easily slip off your shoulder.

You can also find this bag on the Baggu website.

6. Bedi – Mile-End Tote

  • Manufacturing Company: Bedi
  • Amazon Star Rating: N/A
  • Current Price: $157
  • Materials: Nylon
  • Dimension: 15″ H x 13″ W
  • Get This Bag: Bedi

Bedi’s Mile-End reusable tote bag is made of 100% dead-stock nylon and upcycled belt webbing from cars. These dead-stock materials are repurposed from leftover items that are no longer in use, making them quite sustainable since they directly help reduce automotive waste. 

This reusable bag is made to last. The nylon fabric is thicker and has more layers than typical reusable tote bags, and the straps are repurposed belt webbings, making it extremely sturdy. This is a perfect go-to bag for more than just grocery trips! The Bedi bag has an interior pocket for keeping your smaller items more organized and a D ring for clipping your keys. Another unique feature of this reusable bag is its reversible design, which allows you to turn the bag inside out and get a new look with the pocket and D ring on the exterior.

Bedi believes that one day, everything new will come from something old. This is why the company focuses on building a circular economy by producing products from plastic waste beyond plastic bottles. The company also established a “Second Life Program,” in which you may exchange a Bedi item you’re done with in exchange for a 25% credit on a new product. Used Second Life items are sold to new customers, helping reduce the need for production of new items. This bag is available in quilted black and navy.

Downsides: We’ve noticed that this bag is not as spacious as the other bags on our list. It is also quite expensive when compared to the other reusable bags in our selection.

Our Top Recommendation Rankings

Most Functional Reusable Bag: Glob – Primary Morph Ripstop

We chose Glob’s Primary Morph Ripstop tote bag as the most functional synthetic fiber reusable bag due to its ability to transform from a small packable pouch, making it easy to carry it around, to a very spacious grocery bag with six bottle exterior compartments. Its zippered interior pocket can be used to store a small wallet, cards, cash, receipts, and more. This not only allows you to carry more products but also makes your grocery trips more organized.

Most Spacious Reusable Bag: Big Baggu

We chose Big Baggu as the most spacious reusable bag due to its larger-than-average dimensions. At 33″ in height and 18″ in width, this bag is perfect if you’re getting a lot of groceries. 

Most Eco-Friendly Reusable Bag: ChicoBag – VITA rePETe Tote Bag

Based on our research, it is clear that ChicoBag’s VITA rePETe tote bag wins our most eco-friendly synthetic fiber reusable bag ranking. ChicoBag is the only carbon-neutral company in our top picks, and ensures all materials contribute to a circular production process.

Most Affordable Reusable Bag: ChicoBag – VITA rePETe Tote Bag and Envirosax – Reusable Grocery Bag

We chose the ChicoBag VITA rePETe and Envirosax reusable tote bags as the most affordable synthetic fiber reusable bags on our list due to their lower prices compared to our other top picks.

Most Artsy Reusable Bag: Envirosax – Reusable Grocery Bag

Envirosax reusable grocery bag wins our most artsy synthetic fiber reusable bag ranking due to its wide range of fashionable and artistic pattern selections.

More Resources

Volume of microplastics found on ocean floor triple in two decades

Microplastic debris found on the bottom of ocean beds has tripled in the past two decades, scientists have warned.

That is despite repeated awareness campaigns and protests calling for the reduction of single-use plastic around the globe.

Study co-author Michael Grelaud said that analysed sediments have remained unaltered on the seafloor since they were deposited decades ago.

Researchers looked at material deposited in the northwestern Mediterranean for the study, the findings of which have been published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

The area was chosen, and the Ebro Delta in particular, because rivers are recognised as ‘hotspots’ for several pollutants and microplastics.

Researcher Laura Simon-Sánchez said: “Since 2000, the amount of plastic particles deposited on the seafloor has tripled and that, far from decreasing, the accumulation has not stopped growing mimicking the production and global use of these materials.”

“Since the 1980s, but especially in the past two decades, the accumulation of polyethene and polypropylene particles from packaging, bottles, and food films has increased, as well as polyester from synthetic fibers in clothing fabrics.”

The study found that the amount of each of the three particles reached a critical level of 1.5mg per kilogram of sediment collected, with polypropylene being the most abundant, followed by polyethylene and polyester.

Close-up side shot of hands shows microplastic waste contaminated with the seaside sand

The research team looked into the degradation status of the buried microplastics and found they no longer degrade, either due to lack of erosion, oxygen, or light.

Marine biologist Professor Patrizia Ziveri said: “The process of fragmentation takes place mostly in the beach sediments, on the sea surface or in the water column.

“Once deposited, degradation is minimal, so plastics from the 1960s remain on the seabed, leaving the signature of human pollution there.”